Kicking and the running game.
12 MEN’S TEAMS · 2026 TO 16 OCT8 Tests · 26.6 kicks per Test · 8.4 clean breaks per 100 carries.
Two numbers that belong together
France average 26.6 kicks in play per Test across their eight completed matches in this edition. Only England average more. France also produce 8.4 clean breaks per 100 carries, the highest rate among the 12 teams compared. Those two observations can coexist. A side does not have to choose a permanent identity as either a kicking team or a running team.
The kicking count describes how often France use the boot over an entire match. The break rate describes what happens when they carry. They have different denominators. Combining them into a single judgement about ambition would discard the useful part of both. Use the chart to move between kicking, carrying and attacking output, with each measure’s unit kept visible.
Volume and efficiency answer different questions
Carries per Test describe activity. Metres per carry describe the recorded return from each carry. Clean breaks per 100 carries describe another type of return, while offloads per 100 carries describe how often the ball is released during contact. A team can lead one of these measures without leading the others.
Fiji’s offloading and Ireland’s defensive workload illustrate why the wider picture matters. More tackles can reflect a long spell without possession. More carries can reflect sustained access to the ball. Neither count, alone, tells us whether the team controlled the match or used its opportunities well. The useful comparison begins by asking what a measure can actually describe.
The sequence is missing from an average
A kick can help create the conditions for a later attack by moving the receiving team, contesting possession or changing where the next phase starts. It can also surrender an opportunity. These season totals do not identify which of those things happened on each occasion. They cannot establish that France’s kicks caused their clean breaks.
To answer that question we would need linked sequences: the kick, the receipt, the return and the next attacking phases. The descriptive chart is a way to find a better question, rather than a substitute for that event-level study. A strong analytical story should stop at the boundary of the evidence.
Twelve teams, different schedules
This comparison covers 48 unique men’s capped Tests from 1 January to 16 October 2026. A match between two tracked teams contributes two team records, giving 93 appearances across the 12-country group. Tests against other opponents are included for the tracked side. The teams have not faced identical schedules.
Per-Test and per-carry rates help compare different sample sizes, but they do not remove differences in opposition, weather, score state or selection. The charts are not an opponent-adjusted rating. They are a clear description of this dated slice of rugby, with a route into each team’s wider numbers.
A more useful description of style
France’s combination is interesting because it complicates a familiar label. They kick frequently in this sample and create breaks at a high rate when carrying. Both belong in the description. So do the sample size and the missing context.
Try selecting England or Fiji, then changing the attacking measure. The point is to see how much a team’s apparent identity changes when the question changes. The related team pages and kicking lab provide the next layer of detail.
Sources & methodology · 2 references
This story draws on our dated research edition. Figures are factual aggregates; prose and visualisations are original. Follow the source links to inspect the underlying reporting.
Read our methodsHow does your team compare?
Change the measure and inspect the matches behind the averages.
Open the kicking lab