From the deepest deficit.

FIVE SUPPORTED RECORD CANDIDATES
Largest deficit29points
Final scoreSouth Korea 38–36 Chile2016-11-19 · Santiago, Chile
56 min
7–36
Full-time
38–36

South Korea Chile

Score checkpoints corroborated by the linked reports.

Sources for this match
Recorded checkpoints, with no invented scoring events between them. Uruguay’s 28-point maximum is a best-supported reconstruction. Wins only; not an exhaustive historical census.

Seven to thirty-six

South Korea trailed Chile 7–36 in Santiago on 19 November 2016. They won 38–36. The recovery required 31 unanswered points after the worst recorded scoreline, overturning a deficit of 29. That is the largest gap in this supported shortlist of men’s Test comeback wins.

A comeback’s size is the largest deficit at any point in the match. It is not automatically the half-time deficit, the number of points scored in the second half, or the final winning margin. Those measures can tell interesting stories too, but mixing them creates a misleading record list.

Fiji’s recovery had several chapters

Fiji were 0–28 behind Tonga in Apia in June 2010, reached half-time at 10–31 and eventually won 41–38. The worst gap was 28, while the half-time gap was 21. A list measured only at the break would understate the scale of that recovery.

The final score also hides the later sequence. Fiji were still behind at 20–38 before a run of 21 unanswered points. Different starting points reveal different parts of the same match. Use the interactive comparison to move between the worst scoreline and the finish, with each checkpoint identified by its evidence.

Uruguay’s 28 needs a qualification

Uruguay’s 35–34 win over Chile in 2007 has a secure half-time score of 0–27 and a documented late score of 28–34. A detailed contemporary report places two Uruguay penalties before Chile’s converted try early in the second half, implying a 6–34 score and a 28-point maximum deficit.

That is the best-supported reconstruction used here. It is not an independently event-coded maximum. Other summaries use the half-time gap of 27. The distinction stays beside the match, because it affects the ranking. A neat chart should not make an uncertain historical sequence look more certain than its sources.

The denominator is the match list

Australia’s 2018 recovery from 7–31 to beat Argentina 45–34 and Wales’s 1999 recovery from 0–23 to win 36–26 complete this five-match selection. All are senior men’s capped XV wins. Draws, club fixtures, women’s matches and sevens do not enter this particular comparison.

This is a researched shortlist of record candidates, not proof that every historical Test has been checked for its maximum deficit. A claim about the largest comeback ever needs a complete match universe and reliable score progression. That is a higher bar than locating several famous recoveries.

What the final score leaves out

A two-point win can contain a 29-point turnaround. A three-point win can contain more than one recovery. The final margin is an ending, while the maximum deficit is a point in a sequence. Both belong in the story.

Choose a match to see the supported checkpoints and source notes. The country pages then connect those historical games to wider coverage. The point is to make the extraordinary result easier to understand without inventing the moments the record does not preserve.

Sources & methodology · 5 references

This story draws on our dated research edition. Figures are factual aggregates; prose and visualisations are original. Follow the source links to inspect the underlying reporting.

  1. Asia Rugby: South Korea v Chile report ↗
  2. World Rugby: notable rugby comebacks ↗
  3. World Rugby: the 2010 Pacific Nations Cup ↗
  4. Rugby365: contemporary Uruguay v Chile report ↗
  5. El Mercurio: contemporary Uruguay result ↗
Read our methods

Follow the national jersey.

Explore the country records and related coverage behind the story.

Explore the teams